<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategic Default Not an Option with Fannie Mae</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/</link>
	<description>New home news and updates about Chicago Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/comment-page-1/#comment-8220</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/?p=5709#comment-8220</guid>
		<description>The motivation for a strategic default may depend on how far a borrower is underwater.
Having a mortgage that’s twice as much as the value of a home could be somewhat discouraging. The prospect of being stuck with a losing investment that may not reach a break-even point for 10 years or more may be enough motivation to take a walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The motivation for a strategic default may depend on how far a borrower is underwater.<br />
Having a mortgage that’s twice as much as the value of a home could be somewhat discouraging. The prospect of being stuck with a losing investment that may not reach a break-even point for 10 years or more may be enough motivation to take a walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealtyTrac, Trulia, TransUnion &#124; Housing Market Forecasts &#124; Chicagoland Real Estate Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/comment-page-1/#comment-4012</link>
		<dc:creator>RealtyTrac, Trulia, TransUnion &#124; Housing Market Forecasts &#124; Chicagoland Real Estate Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/?p=5709#comment-4012</guid>
		<description>[...] up from 41 percent in May. Men (57 percent) are more likely than women (40 percent) to consider a strategic default to deal with their negative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up from 41 percent in May. Men (57 percent) are more likely than women (40 percent) to consider a strategic default to deal with their negative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/comment-page-1/#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/?p=5709#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>No... borrowers need to keep their promise to repay the loan.  The agreement wasn&#039;t to repay the loan only as long as the investment was good.  If you buy stock on margin, you pay it back even if the stocks go down.  If you buy a car, you don&#039;t get credit for the depreciation just because you drive it off the lot.  If you spend 10k on a patio and pool, you aren&#039;t guaranteed to get it back.

The bottom line is that the borrowers promised to repay the loan and a strategic defaulter has the means... but &#039;strategically&#039; decides not to because they made a bad bet on real estate values (like many of us).  I&#039;m under water... but I continue to make the payment because my word is worth something.

Keep in mind, this is different than those of us who&#039;s income has dropped or have lost our jobs.  Those aren&#039;t strategic defaults.  They ARE defaults, however.  The lenders should then look at see what the best options are... but its not to forgive debt.  Maybe a temporary forebearence until the income situation is solved because that&#039;s the best for BOTH parties.  If the income curtailment is permanent, however, something temporary isn&#039;t going to help and maybe selling the home that can no longer be afforded is the best choice (however unfortunate).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230; borrowers need to keep their promise to repay the loan.  The agreement wasn&#8217;t to repay the loan only as long as the investment was good.  If you buy stock on margin, you pay it back even if the stocks go down.  If you buy a car, you don&#8217;t get credit for the depreciation just because you drive it off the lot.  If you spend 10k on a patio and pool, you aren&#8217;t guaranteed to get it back.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the borrowers promised to repay the loan and a strategic defaulter has the means&#8230; but &#8216;strategically&#8217; decides not to because they made a bad bet on real estate values (like many of us).  I&#8217;m under water&#8230; but I continue to make the payment because my word is worth something.</p>
<p>Keep in mind, this is different than those of us who&#8217;s income has dropped or have lost our jobs.  Those aren&#8217;t strategic defaults.  They ARE defaults, however.  The lenders should then look at see what the best options are&#8230; but its not to forgive debt.  Maybe a temporary forebearence until the income situation is solved because that&#8217;s the best for BOTH parties.  If the income curtailment is permanent, however, something temporary isn&#8217;t going to help and maybe selling the home that can no longer be afforded is the best choice (however unfortunate).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger D</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/comment-page-1/#comment-2962</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/?p=5709#comment-2962</guid>
		<description>And CitiMortgage is known for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And CitiMortgage is known for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger D</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/comment-page-1/#comment-2961</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/?p=5709#comment-2961</guid>
		<description>People chooses to walk away because their servicers keep pushing them to the edge, and won&#039;t cooperate.

These servicers needs to be punished, somebody needs to teach them a lesson. 

Why delay the inevitable? The more you stay in an underwater home the longer you suffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People chooses to walk away because their servicers keep pushing them to the edge, and won&#8217;t cooperate.</p>
<p>These servicers needs to be punished, somebody needs to teach them a lesson. </p>
<p>Why delay the inevitable? The more you stay in an underwater home the longer you suffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/comment-page-1/#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/?p=5709#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading and for commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading and for commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kroll</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/2010/06/23/strategic-default-not-an-option-with-fannie-mae/comment-page-1/#comment-2902</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com/?p=5709#comment-2902</guid>
		<description>Tracey,

I read the article you referenced on the dramatic increase in strategic defaults from March 2009 to March 2010 and found the information valuable. Thanks for a very informative post. I doubt I would have found that article if you did not post it here. Great info!

Regards,

Alan Kroll: Managing Broker
RE/MAX Allegiance - Ashburn, VA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracey,</p>
<p>I read the article you referenced on the dramatic increase in strategic defaults from March 2009 to March 2010 and found the information valuable. Thanks for a very informative post. I doubt I would have found that article if you did not post it here. Great info!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Alan Kroll: Managing Broker<br />
RE/MAX Allegiance &#8211; Ashburn, VA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.chicagolandrealestateforum.com @ 2012-05-22 23:43:28 -->
